Ashes
New Member
Ex-GM
Swinging past ya knees!
Posts: 19,668
|
Post by Ashes on Jan 1, 2015 22:16:37 GMT -5
Looks like all that came from it was:
-Bring back old tanking rules -Fan Loyalty can't drop after a winning season, making the playoffs, winning the WS
|
|
|
Post by Saitama on Jan 1, 2015 22:23:47 GMT -5
lol there were a ton of people for the game-board transfer
|
|
|
Post by Free Stutter! on Jan 1, 2015 22:34:58 GMT -5
if that game to board happens, there needs to be a limit
|
|
|
Post by Captain America on Jan 1, 2015 22:35:26 GMT -5
lol there were a ton of people for the game-board transfer
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Jan 1, 2015 22:39:33 GMT -5
if that game to board happens, there needs to be a limit this, or just limit how much cash you can trade for in general, after that you have to deposit at 1-1
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Jan 1, 2015 22:40:04 GMT -5
or, you can deposit at 3-1 up to say 9 million, then another 6 at 2-1, then its 1-1
|
|
|
Post by Free Stutter! on Jan 1, 2015 22:40:11 GMT -5
if that game to board happens, there needs to be a limit this, or just limit how much cash you can trade for in general, after that you have to deposit at 1-1 this
|
|
|
Post by Free Stutter! on Jan 1, 2015 22:40:29 GMT -5
or, you can deposit at 3-1 up to say 9 million, then another 6 at 2-1, then its 1-1 i was going to suggest 9 million
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Jan 1, 2015 22:41:11 GMT -5
or, you can deposit at 3-1 up to say 9 million, then another 6 at 2-1, then its 1-1 i was going to suggest 9 million those are game cash numbers, but yeah
|
|
Ashes
New Member
Ex-GM
Swinging past ya knees!
Posts: 19,668
|
Post by Ashes on Jan 1, 2015 22:41:50 GMT -5
lol there were a ton of people for the game-board transfer It needs to be discussed more. Straight 3-1 ratios with no limits is completely stupid. Lol at the prospect of teams like me, yours, plays, spencers etc being able to just run $140 mil payrolls and bail our own selves out.
|
|
Ashes
New Member
Ex-GM
Swinging past ya knees!
Posts: 19,668
|
Post by Ashes on Jan 1, 2015 22:42:39 GMT -5
We can make it the primary point of discussion for next offseason
Also, does anyone remember the old tanking rules? I don't
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Jan 1, 2015 22:45:28 GMT -5
We can make it the primary point of discussion for next offseason Also, does anyone remember the old tanking rules? I don't 4. Tanking I'm shifting the tanking rule to 3 season of 100+ games OR 2 seasons of 110+ games OR 1 season of 120+ games. I think that's fair for now. People will want harsher penalties, but they're good for now.
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Jan 1, 2015 22:46:11 GMT -5
the penalties were the same, except to reset you had to hit 63 wins, not the current 53
|
|
|
Post by Saitama on Jan 1, 2015 22:46:23 GMT -5
I feel like teams lose 100 plus games more than we allow.
I think they should start at 110
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Jan 1, 2015 22:46:48 GMT -5
I feel like teams lose 100 plus games more than we allow. I think they should start at 110 the old tanking rules had that
|
|
|
Post by Saitama on Jan 1, 2015 22:46:53 GMT -5
cubs and astros lost over 100 multiple times
|
|
|
Post by Saitama on Jan 1, 2015 22:47:23 GMT -5
I feel like teams lose 100 plus games more than we allow. I think they should start at 110 the old tanking rules had that no i mean you can lose 109 as much as you want. Teams go 53-109 all the time in real life
|
|
|
Post by Saitama on Jan 1, 2015 22:49:03 GMT -5
Or they should start at win count.
If you win less than 55 If you win less than 45 If you win less than 35
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Jan 1, 2015 22:53:45 GMT -5
I feel like teams lose 100 plus games more than we allow. I think they should start at 110 the rules already started at 110, nobody got punished whatsoever
|
|
|
Post by Saitama on Jan 1, 2015 22:54:56 GMT -5
I feel like teams lose 100 plus games more than we allow. I think they should start at 110 the rules already started at 110, nobody got punished whatsoever 3 season of 100+ What are you smoking
|
|
|
Post by Free Stutter! on Jan 1, 2015 22:58:15 GMT -5
the old tanking rules were perfect
|
|
|
Post by Saitama on Jan 1, 2015 22:59:20 GMT -5
the old tanking rules were perfect idk i had teams that i tried hard to get 62 wins with during rebuild and it was damn hard if your in a tough division
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Jan 1, 2015 23:07:25 GMT -5
I tried as hard as I could to lose to get Mike Trout
I managed to win 55
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 2, 2015 1:58:02 GMT -5
the old tanking rules were perfect
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 2, 2015 1:58:06 GMT -5
Yee
|
|