|
|
Post by Erbes on Jan 9, 2014 9:16:29 GMT -5
So the Franchise Player salary rule is being thrown all out of whack because of the $20M salaries we have. So how about this for a revamp...
Two options:
1. $15M x 10 yrs. It's kind of dumb to have this option, but I feel like it's a basic contract these days irl.
2. The average of the top 5 players at the same position (RF, CF, LF will all count as OF; 2B and SS will all count as MI; 1B and 3B will all count as CI), maximum of one $20M contract in the average. Years will be determined by the players loyalty: minimum loyalty will be 6 years, average loyalty will be 7 years, loyal loyalty will be 8 years. More than likely this will be the more expensive option so you don't have to commit for as many years.
At the end of any of these options, you and the player are free to part ways with no penalty. So minimum the player is with you would be 12 years. That's pretty franchisey to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by gmgreggor on Jan 9, 2014 9:32:02 GMT -5
2
|
|
Birdie Sanders
General Manager 
Cincinnati Reds
Blaze all day, every day Each way, the right way My way, greenhay, we high
Posts: 22,220
|
Post by Birdie Sanders on Jan 9, 2014 9:36:49 GMT -5
2
|
|
greeme
General Manager
San Diego Padres
Posts: 28,432
|
Post by greeme on Jan 9, 2014 10:40:33 GMT -5
is this an either or vote? or did you mean that it is a choice we will have
|
|
|
|
Post by Free Stutter! on Jan 9, 2014 10:42:30 GMT -5
2
|
|
|
|
Post by Free Stutter! on Jan 9, 2014 10:42:38 GMT -5
wait for it........
|
|
|
|
Post by Free Stutter! on Jan 9, 2014 10:42:47 GMT -5
wait for it........
|
|
|
|
Post by Erbes on Jan 9, 2014 10:43:07 GMT -5
Yeah it's not a vote. It's a choice you'll have when your franchise player is due for an extension.
|
|
|
|
Post by Free Stutter! on Jan 9, 2014 10:50:42 GMT -5
ehh....
not a fan of the 15 X 10. There is no really negative to having a franchise player if we're using that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Free Stutter! on Jan 9, 2014 10:50:55 GMT -5
real*
|
|
|
|
Post by Free Stutter! on Jan 9, 2014 10:54:58 GMT -5
Age is really the only negative about the 15 x 10.
|
|
|
|
Post by Erbes on Jan 9, 2014 10:56:28 GMT -5
ehh.... not a fan of the 15 X 10. There is no really negative to having a franchise player if we're using that. 10 seasons is a longggg time. If he signs when he's 25, he'll be done with the contract at 35. The team won't be competitive for 10 years (most likely) so that contract could become a burden. Plus, if you look at the average option... 2B and SS don't get paid. So that average will be quite low. Same with 1B and 3B really. Only players getting paid right now are SP and OF. |
|
|
|
Post by Erbes on Jan 9, 2014 10:58:16 GMT -5
Honestly, the 2nd option is much better than $15 x 10 for anyone who isn't a SP or a OF. Wow. Ugh. Need to revise looks like.
|
|
|
|
Post by Youth Movement on Jan 9, 2014 11:00:16 GMT -5
what's funny is i don't think any of my stars have even asked for that much in resignings.To me the negative, is the salary lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by Free Stutter! on Jan 9, 2014 11:02:37 GMT -5
what's funny is i don't think any of my stars have even asked for that much in resignings.To me the negative, is the salary lol. expos players take cheap deals all the time |
|
|
|
Post by crazymike2021 on Jan 9, 2014 11:03:40 GMT -5
2
|
|
greeme
General Manager
San Diego Padres
Posts: 28,432
|
Post by greeme on Jan 9, 2014 11:05:21 GMT -5
what's funny is i don't think any of my stars have even asked for that much in resignings.To me the negative, is the salary lol. it seems a lot of stars sign for less, the big plus is the no pd if there wasnt an age limit almost nobody would get franchised before their reversal |
|
|
|
Post by Youth Movement on Jan 9, 2014 11:07:00 GMT -5
what's funny is i don't think any of my stars have even asked for that much in resignings.To me the negative, is the salary lol. it seems a lot of stars sign for less, the big plus is the no pd if there wasnt an age limit almost nobody would get franchised before their reversal yea, i know the positive outweighs the negative due to the pd thing, i was just pointing out the negative from my experiences. |
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Jan 9, 2014 14:02:00 GMT -5
Ithe issue with separating it position ally is you have to decide what position the guy is best at, because you'll see guys play out of position to save themselves money if it's done that way
|
|
greeme
General Manager
San Diego Padres
Posts: 28,432
|
Post by greeme on Jan 9, 2014 14:03:15 GMT -5
Ithe issue with separating it position ally is you have to decide what position the guy is best at, because you'll see guys play out of position to save themselves money if it's done that way |
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Jan 9, 2014 14:03:49 GMT -5
How about the top 3 plus x amount or 15x10
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Jan 9, 2014 14:04:19 GMT -5
Meh hate typing on my phone
|
|
RoyalsGM
New Member
Kansas City Royals
Posts: 4,232
|
Post by RoyalsGM on Jan 9, 2014 14:08:25 GMT -5
dump the rule entirely and add a salary cap.
or compensation.
|
|
greeme
General Manager
San Diego Padres
Posts: 28,432
|
Post by greeme on Jan 9, 2014 14:08:40 GMT -5
How about the top 3 plus x amount or 15x10 what about top 20 avg instead of top 5? |
|
greeme
General Manager
San Diego Padres
Posts: 28,432
|
Post by greeme on Jan 9, 2014 14:13:45 GMT -5
dump the rule entirely and add a salary cap. or compensation. fa compensation would be good if i was getting compensated i would just let soriano go |
|
