waldo
New Member
Chicago White Sox
Posts: 2,119
|
Post by waldo on Dec 23, 2012 18:57:02 GMT -5
In addition to increasing someones defensive range, is anyone open to expanding rewards to learning a new position?
Learning a new position can cost $5M and a player would only be elegible if he has played over 100 games at the desired position. A new position could only be acquired during the offseason and the player would start off with E range and a .930 fielding % for a new IF position and .950 for learning an OF position.
Improving fielding % could also be incorporated as well. Maybe $1M for a 10 point increase and a .990 fielding percentage improvement cap?
Thoughts?
|
|
Ashes
New Member
Ex-GM
Swinging past ya knees!
Posts: 19,668
|
Post by Ashes on Dec 23, 2012 18:57:55 GMT -5
I like it
|
|
|
Post by Youth Movement on Dec 23, 2012 19:16:08 GMT -5
I kinda like it. a Fat corner infielder shouldn't be able to move to CF though imo
|
|
|
Post by bravesgm on Dec 23, 2012 19:31:24 GMT -5
In addition to increasing someones defensive range, is anyone open to expanding rewards to learning a new position? Learning a new position can cost $5M and a player would only be elegible if he has played over 100 games at the desired position. A new position could only be acquired during the offseason and the player would start off with E range and a .930 fielding % for a new IF position and .950 for learning an OF position. Improving fielding % could also be incorporated as well. Maybe $1M for a 10 point increase and a .990 fielding percentage improvement cap? Thoughts? You can already do it in the game. I've taught many players different spots in the minors as they develop. Sometimes it works, sometimes they don't adjust. Also can be done in Spring training using the points they allot for different things. So to answer your question, no I don't think it should cost to teach players a new position.
|
|
|
Post by Youth Movement on Dec 23, 2012 19:42:11 GMT -5
how does spring training work?
|
|
steve
New Member
Ex-GM
Posts: 29,203
|
Post by steve on Dec 23, 2012 19:52:18 GMT -5
In addition to increasing someones defensive range, is anyone open to expanding rewards to learning a new position? Learning a new position can cost $5M and a player would only be elegible if he has played over 100 games at the desired position. A new position could only be acquired during the offseason and the player would start off with E range and a .930 fielding % for a new IF position and .950 for learning an OF position. Improving fielding % could also be incorporated as well. Maybe $1M for a 10 point increase and a .990 fielding percentage improvement cap? Thoughts? You can already do it in the game. I've taught many players different spots in the minors as they develop. Sometimes it works, sometimes they don't adjust. Also can be done in Spring training using the points they allot for different things. So to answer your question, no I don't think it should cost to teach players a new position. I pretty much agree with this. Although, if you want to spend $5 mil to do it when there are free ways to do it in the game, I'm not sure I'd have a problem with that.
|
|
steve
New Member
Ex-GM
Posts: 29,203
|
Post by steve on Dec 23, 2012 19:53:14 GMT -5
how does spring training work? you get points to give out for each player on areas to focus. if you allocate more points on one area (eg learning a new position), they will improve in that area, but they will regress in the area you took points away from.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 23, 2012 19:54:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Youth Movement on Dec 23, 2012 19:56:11 GMT -5
how does spring training work? you get points to give out for each player on areas to focus. if you allocate more points on one area (eg learning a new position), they will improve in that area, but they will regress in the area you took points away from. ohh, i can't wait to experience that.
|
|
|
Post by Erbes on Dec 24, 2012 1:37:25 GMT -5
Meh you can do this in game. Leaning hard no.
|
|