|
Post by Saitama on Jul 16, 2013 23:58:42 GMT -5
Whatever if anyone else brought this up there would be serious discussion about the wording of the rules and future precedence but it's just a gang up on me because I have a bad history in the past here. This was shoddy on every end including my own and I've said that. I'm done with this crap. I keep saying I'm going to keep to myself but everytime I loosen up on it I end up going too far.
|
|
|
Post by Saitama on Jul 16, 2013 23:59:40 GMT -5
Saying this is 100% my fault is completely wrong because Seattle didn't post them either.
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Jul 17, 2013 0:02:09 GMT -5
Saying this is 100% my fault is completely wrong because Seattle didn't post them either. who posted the trade again?
|
|
|
Post by Saitama on Jul 17, 2013 0:02:24 GMT -5
Saying this is 100% my fault is completely wrong because Seattle didn't post them either. who posted the trade again? Seattle.
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Jul 17, 2013 0:02:53 GMT -5
yyou are looking for every way to say, Yeah, sure, its my fault, but hey, its also majorly this guys, and dont forget abgout him, just accept that you fucked up, without it, none of this happens.
|
|
|
Post by Saitama on Jul 17, 2013 0:04:13 GMT -5
The wording of the rule still says the post gets rejected. Within the rules word for word I'm right and I'm done arguing the semantics around it.
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Jul 17, 2013 0:04:15 GMT -5
or shift the blame to Nanz, but counting on Nanz, seriously?
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Jul 17, 2013 0:04:51 GMT -5
The wording of the rule still says the post gets rejected. Within the rules word for word I'm right and I'm done arguing the semantics around it. and yet again, you posted a two part trade. I dont care if it was one post or not, because your post later also said put through the cash now...
|
|
|
Post by Saitama on Jul 17, 2013 0:05:00 GMT -5
The wording of the rule still says the post gets rejected. Within the rules word for word I'm right and I'm done arguing the semantics around it.
|
|
|
Post by Saitama on Jul 17, 2013 0:05:31 GMT -5
That is a semantics argument and is not the final wording of the rules. You're argument has no factual basis in logic and rulings.
|
|
|
Post by bravesgm on Jul 17, 2013 0:05:59 GMT -5
Saying this is 100% my fault is completely wrong because Seattle didn't post them either. But he's not here throwing a fit about the extra money he just spend on Guttierez's contract for the extra week he had him. Drop it, go on. You know you're not getting anything in return except more BS from people when you don't drop it.
|
|
|
Post by Saitama on Jul 17, 2013 0:07:16 GMT -5
Saying this is 100% my fault is completely wrong because Seattle didn't post them either. But he's not here throwing a fit about the extra money he just spend on Guttierez's contract for the extra week he had him. Drop it, go on. You know you're not getting anything in return except more BS from people when you don't drop it. I had dropped it and turned it into a discussion to change the wording of the rules but you brought it back to me.
|
|
|
Post by Saitama on Jul 17, 2013 0:08:42 GMT -5
Word for word in the rules my argument holds water. If anyone who wasn't a negatively viewed GM in this league had brought it up there would have been legitimate discussion. That's a fact.
|
|
|
Post by bravesgm on Jul 17, 2013 0:08:44 GMT -5
That is a semantics argument and is not the final wording of the rules. You're argument has no factual basis in logic and rulings. So he processed what you asked him to process and now you're whining about that? You are making 0 sense at this point in time. Who is to blame? Seattle for not posting positions. You for not realizing that fact as well. Commish for being a nice guy and processing part that shouldn't be processed, but you asked him to so he did.
|
|
|
Post by Saitama on Jul 17, 2013 0:10:31 GMT -5
I'm arguing that I should have been wrong before. I take a circular approach which is stupid but in the end I was right in the fact this should have never been processed word for word from the rules.
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Jul 17, 2013 0:10:44 GMT -5
That is a semantics argument and is not the final wording of the rules. You're argument has no factual basis in logic and rulings. yet again, stop your fucking whining you entitled little crybaby. Your entire goal at every turn is to turn this into Erbes fucking you over again, or cheating you again...all these passive agressive little shots because you think he is out to get you at every turn, just get over yourself, you arent that important. Erbes put through a two part trade in the order it was done. (actually, he really didnt, since Board cash is claimed elsewhere and linked no?) so he really did nothing at all to put the trade through, he said claim the board cash with a link...he didnt process anything.
|
|
|
Post by bravesgm on Jul 17, 2013 0:10:59 GMT -5
Word for word in the rules my argument holds water. If anyone who wasn't a negatively viewed GM in this league had brought it up there would have been legitimate discussion. That's a fact. So realize that, learn from it and don't pick petty arguments with the commish? You asked him to process that part of the trade. He did. Now your argument is based on the fact that it shouldn't have been processed at all. If that's the case you'd have been arguing then about how it was dumb he wouldn't process part of the trade that didn't require him to do any work and that he was picking on you.
|
|
|
Post by Saitama on Jul 17, 2013 0:11:21 GMT -5
He's a nice guy when it benefits someone else but a stickler to me is the point you just made and makes no sense in the view that I'm not getting screwed then.
|
|
|
Post by Saitama on Jul 17, 2013 0:12:26 GMT -5
I'm just not posting on this anymore. It'll go through next sim and that's that. No point in arguing further when nothing is going to change.
|
|
|
Post by Saitama on Jul 17, 2013 0:12:43 GMT -5
Wasted my last 30 minutes.
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Jul 17, 2013 0:14:09 GMT -5
I'm just not posting on this anymore. It'll go through next sim and that's that. No point in arguing further when nothing is going to change. Erbes doesnt deal with board cash, he never said trade in, or valid, he told you guys to post a linkto your trade in the board cash section, so yeah, you have no ground at all, Erbes never processed anything
|
|
|
Post by Saitama on Jul 17, 2013 0:14:22 GMT -5
I'm so sick and tired of arguing about stuff yet I still do it. I don't know what the fuck is wrong with me.
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Jul 17, 2013 0:15:27 GMT -5
so your argument holds no ground, its not valid in anyway, and if you have a problem with anybody, its gotta be what, ashes? cause he didnt validate the trades legitimacy (except thats not his problem in the first place, its between you, and Nanz)
|
|
|
Post by bravesgm on Jul 17, 2013 0:15:27 GMT -5
Wow. Argument going in circles. You're right...you're wrong. Commish is picking on you. Commish isn't following rules. Someone posts rule. Commish shouldn't have done what I asked him to do for the trade. It's not my fault I didn't make sure the original post was correct. It's Nanz's fault. Commish being nice to others but picking on me again. No one likes me, everyone is against me. Keep me at the center of attention. Don't pick on me.
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Jul 17, 2013 0:15:48 GMT -5
Wow. Argument going in circles. You're right...you're wrong. Commish is picking on you. Commish isn't following rules. Someone posts rule. Commish shouldn't have done what I asked him to do for the trade. It's not my fault I didn't make sure the original post was correct. It's Nanz's fault. Commish being nice to others but picking on me again. No one likes me, everyone is against me. Keep me at the center of attention. Don't pick on me.
|
|