Rooster Cogburn
General Manager
Los Angeles Dodgers
“Life if tough. It's tougher if you're stupid."
Posts: 19,945
|
Post by Rooster Cogburn on Nov 13, 2014 14:38:45 GMT -5
he had a cei
|
|
Rooster Cogburn
General Manager
Los Angeles Dodgers
“Life if tough. It's tougher if you're stupid."
Posts: 19,945
|
Post by Rooster Cogburn on Nov 13, 2014 14:38:54 GMT -5
I thought he was dead
|
|
Rooster Cogburn
General Manager
Los Angeles Dodgers
“Life if tough. It's tougher if you're stupid."
Posts: 19,945
|
Post by Rooster Cogburn on Nov 13, 2014 14:39:05 GMT -5
didn't know I could random him
|
|
Rooster Cogburn
General Manager
Los Angeles Dodgers
“Life if tough. It's tougher if you're stupid."
Posts: 19,945
|
Post by Rooster Cogburn on Nov 13, 2014 14:39:12 GMT -5
so I released him
|
|
Rooster Cogburn
General Manager
Los Angeles Dodgers
“Life if tough. It's tougher if you're stupid."
Posts: 19,945
|
Post by Rooster Cogburn on Nov 13, 2014 14:39:19 GMT -5
break signed him
|
|
Rooster Cogburn
General Manager
Los Angeles Dodgers
“Life if tough. It's tougher if you're stupid."
Posts: 19,945
|
Post by Rooster Cogburn on Nov 13, 2014 14:39:28 GMT -5
my stupidity
|
|
Rooster Cogburn
General Manager
Los Angeles Dodgers
“Life if tough. It's tougher if you're stupid."
Posts: 19,945
|
Post by Rooster Cogburn on Nov 13, 2014 14:39:35 GMT -5
I know better now
|
|
Rooster Cogburn
General Manager
Los Angeles Dodgers
“Life if tough. It's tougher if you're stupid."
Posts: 19,945
|
Post by Rooster Cogburn on Nov 13, 2014 14:39:45 GMT -5
too late for McKinley tho
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Nov 13, 2014 14:44:51 GMT -5
Old rules were way better. These rules were put into effect when Erbes wanted to start tanking.
|
|
|
Post by stooolfan on Nov 13, 2014 14:45:24 GMT -5
good thing i traded him haha He sees the future!!!!!!
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Nov 13, 2014 14:46:12 GMT -5
Old rules were way better. These rules were put into effect when Erbes wanted to start tanking.
|
|
|
Post by stooolfan on Nov 13, 2014 14:46:16 GMT -5
Old rules were way better. These rules were put into effect when Erbes wanted to start tanking. What were the old rules?
|
|
|
Post by Captain America on Nov 13, 2014 14:46:36 GMT -5
Old rules were way better. These rules were put into effect when Erbes wanted to start tanking. lulz
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Nov 13, 2014 14:46:38 GMT -5
My offense decided to suck this sim...thats crappy.
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Nov 13, 2014 14:48:18 GMT -5
we are terrible at both hitting Homers, and giving up homers...seems like a bad combo
|
|
|
Post by Captain America on Nov 13, 2014 14:48:27 GMT -5
The Hart of old is back!
|
|
|
Post by Irish McIrishy on Nov 13, 2014 14:51:14 GMT -5
Old rules were way better. These rules were put into effect when Erbes wanted to start tanking.
|
|
|
Post by Erbes on Nov 13, 2014 14:51:27 GMT -5
Old rules were way better. These rules were put into effect when Erbes wanted to start tanking. Lol I wouldn't have broken the old rules either. IDIOT.
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Nov 13, 2014 14:52:19 GMT -5
Old rules were way better. These rules were put into effect when Erbes wanted to start tanking. Lol I wouldn't have broken the old rules either. IDIOT. doesnt mean you expected not to..shit, even I expected I would have.
|
|
|
Post by Erbes on Nov 13, 2014 14:52:50 GMT -5
Under the old rules you got 3 years to lose 100 games and if it happened a 4th time in a row you got penalized. I didn't do that!
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Nov 13, 2014 14:54:01 GMT -5
Under the old rules you got 3 years to lose 100 games and if it happened a 4th time in a row you got penalized. I didn't do that! it was 1 season of under 43 wins, 2 of under 53, 3 of under 63 no?? and that was the first penalty, because teams got penalized for under 43 first off and it increased yearly
|
|
|
Post by Erbes on Nov 13, 2014 14:54:36 GMT -5
Lol I wouldn't have broken the old rules either. IDIOT. doesnt mean you expected not to..shit, even I expected I would have. Lol my intentions weren't to change the rule for my benefit. Wtf. Have I done anything in this league for my sole benefit? The tanking rules were too strict in general. They made it too hard to rebuild for small market teams.
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Nov 13, 2014 14:55:17 GMT -5
doesnt mean you expected not to..shit, even I expected I would have. Lol my intentions weren't to change the rule for my benefit. Wtf. Have I done anything in this league for my sole benefit? The tanking rules were too strict in general. They made it too hard to rebuild for small market teams. nobody should ever be 2-31
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Nov 13, 2014 14:55:38 GMT -5
rebuilding is way too safe now, with the PD reversal increases and what not
|
|
|
Post by Erbes on Nov 13, 2014 14:56:22 GMT -5
Under the old rules you got 3 years to lose 100 games and if it happened a 4th time in a row you got penalized. I didn't do that! it was 1 season of under 43 wins, 2 of under 53, 3 of under 63 no?? and that was the first penalty, because teams got penalized for under 43 first off and it increased yearly I'm remembering it differently then. And if it was what you say then yeah I'm fine with the rule change lol.
|
|