Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Apr 22, 2014 15:20:53 GMT -5
ok what about when cp3 was out The only time there will be a difference is when one or the other is off the court.
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Apr 22, 2014 15:21:36 GMT -5
CP3 is the Clippers best player, no question
|
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Apr 22, 2014 15:27:09 GMT -5
um ok when did I say he wasnt?
|
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Apr 22, 2014 15:27:25 GMT -5
none of your posts have anything to do with what I said
|
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Apr 22, 2014 15:31:20 GMT -5
and id like to know cp3s minutes without blake on the floor and blakes without cp3 lol
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Apr 22, 2014 15:43:53 GMT -5
more efficient at least. cp3 dribbles too much a lot of times This
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Apr 22, 2014 15:44:39 GMT -5
and id like to know cp3s minutes without blake on the floor and blakes without cp3 lol why does this matter? if the offense is more efficient without CP3, it should hold true whenever Blake is on the court without CP3
|
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Apr 22, 2014 15:45:41 GMT -5
i think it was their FG% that was a good bit higher
|
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Apr 22, 2014 15:46:18 GMT -5
and id like to know cp3s minutes without blake on the floor and blakes without cp3 lol why does this matter? if the offense is more efficient without CP3, it should hold true whenever Blake is on the court without CP3 sample sizes
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Apr 22, 2014 15:53:31 GMT -5
but if they score more points per possession with CP3 on the court vs. Blake on the court....then they are more efficient with CP3.....
|
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Apr 22, 2014 15:54:03 GMT -5
probably equates to what about 10 games for cp3 without blake? and 25-30 for blake. big difference. you could easily take a 5-10 game stretch for blake during those games and it be more impressive than pauls
|
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Apr 22, 2014 15:54:49 GMT -5
eh so much goes into that. i was talking about FG% mainly
|
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Apr 22, 2014 15:57:47 GMT -5
the ball moving so much better
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Apr 22, 2014 15:57:52 GMT -5
probably equates to what about 10 games for cp3 without blake? and 25-30 for blake. big difference. you could easily take a 5-10 game stretch for blake during those games and it be more impressive than pauls it also includes the minutes where one plays without the other in a game though
|
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Apr 22, 2014 15:58:07 GMT -5
cp3 is just so important defensively and late in games
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Apr 22, 2014 15:58:19 GMT -5
oh my god at the ball moving so much better without CP3...yes, because that is why CP3 averages 10+ assists per game
|
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Apr 22, 2014 15:58:56 GMT -5
probably equates to what about 10 games for cp3 without blake? and 25-30 for blake. big difference. you could easily take a 5-10 game stretch for blake during those games and it be more impressive than pauls it also includes the minutes where one plays without the other in a game though i know thats what i was saying. just guessed. probably a few more games for both not sure how many mpg they have with the other off the court each game
|
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Apr 22, 2014 15:59:20 GMT -5
oh my god at the ball moving so much better without CP3...yes, because that is why CP3 averages 10+ assists per game and?
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Apr 22, 2014 16:00:34 GMT -5
what a ball hog CP3 is, not letting the ball move around and such, needs to let go of the ball more often, so he can not pass to open teammates
|
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Apr 22, 2014 16:00:35 GMT -5
cp3 is awesome not trying to shit on him or anything lol. but the offense being basically just as good with griffin running it and in a 20+ more game sample size is impressive
|
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Apr 22, 2014 16:01:00 GMT -5
what a ball hog CP3 is, not letting the ball move around and such, needs to let go of the ball more often, so he can not pass to open teammates yep because thats what i said
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Apr 22, 2014 16:02:49 GMT -5
what a ball hog CP3 is, not letting the ball move around and such, needs to let go of the ball more often, so he can not pass to open teammates yep because thats what i said essentially it is, you said the offense was better without CP3 in there. That he dribbles to much, that the ball moves better without him, and that they were more efficient without him so if an offense is stagnant, less efficient, and overall worse with a player...how are you calling him good
|
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Apr 22, 2014 16:04:53 GMT -5
yep because thats what i said essentially it is, you said the offense was better without CP3 in there. That he dribbles to much, that the ball moves better without him, and that they were more efficient without him so if an offense is stagnant, less efficient, and overall worse with a player...how are you calling him good it was more efficient didnt know cp3 made up the difference when he came back from injury. the ball does move more without him nothing wrong with that doesnt mean he isnt good. you suck at trolling
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Apr 22, 2014 16:05:50 GMT -5
essentially it is, you said the offense was better without CP3 in there. That he dribbles to much, that the ball moves better without him, and that they were more efficient without him so if an offense is stagnant, less efficient, and overall worse with a player...how are you calling him good it was more efficient didnt know cp3 made up the difference when he came back from injury. the ball does move more without him nothing wrong with that doesnt mean he isnt good. you suck at trolling ball movement for the sake of ball movement means nothing.
|
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Apr 22, 2014 16:05:47 GMT -5
cp3 is widely considered the best PG in the league the fact we are even comparing griffin to him just makes griffins case stronger in this thread
|
|