|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 16, 2013 18:29:20 GMT -5
smh shale.
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain America on Dec 16, 2013 18:29:30 GMT -5
Lold he's not moving up two spots just like Houston isn't moving down 6 if you move Boston down 3...they drop to 7,which makes Arizona 6 then you drop Houston from 1 to 6 five spots, which makes Arizona 5 its either that, or you drop Houston first, then Boston, which makes Break only drop 2. Im not arguing for either way, just a matter of clarification. Idc what happens as long as the Astros' original pick isn't 5th |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 16, 2013 18:29:35 GMT -5
Multiple rule violations.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 16, 2013 18:30:17 GMT -5
if you move Boston down 3...they drop to 7,which makes Arizona 6 then you drop Houston from 1 to 6 five spots, which makes Arizona 5 its either that, or you drop Houston first, then Boston, which makes Break only drop 2. Im not arguing for either way, just a matter of clarification. Idc what happens as long as the Astros' original pick isn't 5th Well dont get your feelings hurt if thats where it ens up. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 16, 2013 18:30:27 GMT -5
smh
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 16, 2013 18:30:40 GMT -5
Anybody looks, Im not jumping.
|
|
Broph
General Manager 
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Dec 16, 2013 18:30:48 GMT -5
based on Erbes wording, only options are Arizona/Houston/Boston or Houston/Boston/Arizona
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain America on Dec 16, 2013 18:31:17 GMT -5
Idc what happens as long as the Astros' original pick isn't 5th Well dont get your feelings hurt if thats where it ens up. It wouldn't be hurt. It would just be bullshit and Styro's bitch ass would get lucky off that. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 16, 2013 18:31:31 GMT -5
based on Erbes wording, only options are Arizona/Houston/Boston or Houston/Boston/Arizona True. Erbes kinda fucked himself. Should done 5 spots for both lol. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 16, 2013 18:31:43 GMT -5
Well dont get your feelings hurt if thats where it ens up. It wouldn't be hurt. It would just be bullshit and Styro's bitch ass would get lucky off that. Why is it bullshit? |
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Dec 16, 2013 18:31:44 GMT -5
bos should be at 6 hou 5 no?
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 16, 2013 18:32:02 GMT -5
based on Erbes wording, only options are Arizona/Houston/Boston or Houston/Boston/Arizona True. Erbes kinda fucked himself. Should done 5 spots for both lol. Erbes does quite enjoying fucking himself though. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 16, 2013 18:32:16 GMT -5
bos should be at 6 hou 5 no? Agreed. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 16, 2013 18:32:25 GMT -5
I want a WS title.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 16, 2013 18:32:33 GMT -5
4 would be sick.
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain America on Dec 16, 2013 18:32:47 GMT -5
It wouldn't be hurt. It would just be bullshit and Styro's bitch ass would get lucky off that. Why is it bullshit? Because in all other tanking penalty situations, the team with the worst record had the 6th pick. It's that simple. Break's shit should not interfere with that. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 16, 2013 18:32:57 GMT -5
If I win a 4th title I might rebuild.
|
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Dec 16, 2013 18:32:57 GMT -5
let me win
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 16, 2013 18:33:19 GMT -5
Because in all other tanking penalty situations, the team with the worst record had the 6th pick. It's that simple. Break's shit should not interfere with that. I think you are the only one that thinks this way. |
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Dec 16, 2013 18:33:31 GMT -5
Because in all other tanking penalty situations, the team with the worst record had the 6th pick. It's that simple. Break's shit should not interfere with that. lol gtfo lets just drop him 5 then hou would still move up |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 16, 2013 18:33:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 16, 2013 18:34:12 GMT -5
Ya, it doesnt really matter.
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain America on Dec 16, 2013 18:34:15 GMT -5
Because in all other tanking penalty situations, the team with the worst record had the 6th pick. It's that simple. Break's shit should not interfere with that. lol gtfo lets just drop him 5 then hou would still move up That's the thing. The Astros pick should not be moved up due to Break's shit. If it happens, whatever, but it shouldn't be like that. |
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Dec 16, 2013 18:34:17 GMT -5
he does have a point...if the top five teams got a penalty for tanking too hard, you wouldnt leave it as is correct? 6-10 would all move up, meaning you go from the best to the worst in order of drop
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 16, 2013 18:34:18 GMT -5
|
|
