|
Post by Spencer on Feb 6, 2014 12:25:22 GMT -5
by rule philly should have dropped. since erbes made an "executive decision" not to drop him he should have made one to lock them in at 2 Why
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 6, 2014 12:26:06 GMT -5
PHI should've dropped is what everyone is saying I get it. But they didnt. So why woukdnt he get 1? I mean it was always up in the air.
|
|
greeme
General Manager
San Diego Padres
Posts: 28,432
|
Post by greeme on Feb 6, 2014 12:26:24 GMT -5
Boston dropped. Philly was worse than LA. ah, I thought everybody said that la was worse
|
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Feb 6, 2014 12:26:27 GMT -5
by rule philly should have dropped. since erbes made an "executive decision" not to drop him he should have made one to lock them in at 2 Why b/c they are already getting rewarded by not dropping. why reward them again by bumping their pick up?
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 6, 2014 12:26:39 GMT -5
Love Jennings btw
|
|
greeme
General Manager
San Diego Padres
Posts: 28,432
|
Post by greeme on Feb 6, 2014 12:26:45 GMT -5
that is way cato should be updated
|
|
greeme
General Manager
San Diego Padres
Posts: 28,432
|
Post by greeme on Feb 6, 2014 12:27:23 GMT -5
if philly was worse than why should la have been ahead of them?
|
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Feb 6, 2014 12:27:52 GMT -5
well by rule philly should have dropped 5 spots
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 6, 2014 12:28:06 GMT -5
b/c they are already getting rewarded by not dropping. why reward them again by bumping their pick up? It wouldve made less sense to bump La ahead of Phi. Once the decision is made not yo drop PHI then the rest just follows suit
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Feb 6, 2014 12:28:27 GMT -5
|
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Feb 6, 2014 12:28:39 GMT -5
b/c they are already getting rewarded by not dropping. why reward them again by bumping their pick up? It wouldve made less sense to bump La ahead of Phi. Once the decision is made not yo drop PHI then the rest just follows suit not really, la wans't suppose to get the tanking penalty lol?
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Feb 6, 2014 12:28:42 GMT -5
PHI should've dropped is what everyone is saying The tanking penalty is a penalty for a GM. Not for a 'team' ....financial probation occurs when a 'team' goes in the red. Not a specific GM. They are totally different things. There was a new GM therefor the GM penalty reset.
|
|
greeme
General Manager
San Diego Padres
Posts: 28,432
|
Post by greeme on Feb 6, 2014 12:29:20 GMT -5
As I recall, Erbes reset things for Greeme year one as well huh? I wasn't supposed to drop
|
|
|
Post by Free Stutter! on Feb 6, 2014 12:29:43 GMT -5
As I recall, Erbes reset things for Greeme year one as well greeme didn't come in late in the season.
|
|
greeme
General Manager
San Diego Padres
Posts: 28,432
|
Post by greeme on Feb 6, 2014 12:29:54 GMT -5
b/c they are already getting rewarded by not dropping. why reward them again by bumping their pick up? It wouldve made less sense to bump La ahead of Phi. Once the decision is made not yo drop PHI then the rest just follows suit
|
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Feb 6, 2014 12:30:12 GMT -5
i dont think they should drop. jsut dont think they should get #1
its erbes fault he could have gave cc the phillies a month ago
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Feb 6, 2014 12:30:31 GMT -5
As I recall, Erbes reset things for Greeme year one as well huh? I wasn't supposed to drop You got an extra year. I"m pretty sure you were trying to get talent..then Erbes said you didn't have to so you then tanked that year.
|
|
greeme
General Manager
San Diego Padres
Posts: 28,432
|
Post by greeme on Feb 6, 2014 12:30:32 GMT -5
|
|
greeme
General Manager
San Diego Padres
Posts: 28,432
|
Post by greeme on Feb 6, 2014 12:31:23 GMT -5
huh? I wasn't supposed to drop You got an extra year. I"m pretty sure you were trying to get talent..then Erbes said you didn't have to so you then tanked that year. and last year won't count for cc either nothing to do with his pick dropping or not
|
|
greeme
General Manager
San Diego Padres
Posts: 28,432
|
Post by greeme on Feb 6, 2014 12:31:45 GMT -5
didn't follow the draft at all
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Feb 6, 2014 12:32:03 GMT -5
i dont think they should drop. jsut dont think they should get #1 its erbes fault he could have gave cc the phillies a month ago So they shouldn't get penalized but they should get penalized? You are confusing. Philly didn't get dropped. Boston did. EVERY team 5 spots below Boston moved up one by result. Philly didn't get rewarded more than any of those other teams.
|
|
greeme
General Manager
San Diego Padres
Posts: 28,432
|
Post by greeme on Feb 6, 2014 12:33:29 GMT -5
i dont think they should drop. jsut dont think they should get #1 its erbes fault he could have gave cc the phillies a month ago So they shouldn't get penalized but they should get penalized? You are confusing. Philly didn't get dropped. Boston did. EVERY team 5 spots below Boston moved up one by result. Philly didn't get rewarded more than any of those other teams. lol at expecting logic from kobe
|
|
|
Post by draft on Feb 6, 2014 12:34:16 GMT -5
i dont think they should drop. jsut dont think they should get #1 its erbes fault he could have gave cc the phillies a month ago So they shouldn't get penalized but they should get penalized? You are confusing. Philly didn't get dropped. Boston did. EVERY team 5 spots below Boston moved up one by result. Philly didn't get rewarded more than any of those other teams. How is CC getting penalized? He wasn't here for the season and technically his tenure as GM should have started with the draftr. So that pick should have dropped.
|
|
greeme
General Manager
San Diego Padres
Posts: 28,432
|
Post by greeme on Feb 6, 2014 12:34:59 GMT -5
So they shouldn't get penalized but they should get penalized? You are confusing. Philly didn't get dropped. Boston did. EVERY team 5 spots below Boston moved up one by result. Philly didn't get rewarded more than any of those other teams. How is CC getting penalized? He wasn't here for the season and technically his tenure as GM should have started with the draftr. So that pick should have dropped. go auto somebody
|
|
Bro Namath
General Manager
Montreal Expos
Posts: 27,683
|
Post by Bro Namath on Feb 6, 2014 12:35:13 GMT -5
in the rules it says nothign about gms just the team..
|
|