|
|
Post by If your not first your last on Jun 20, 2013 22:31:15 GMT -5
Tigers deal
2001 #1 overall
Rockies deal
2001 2nd overall
2001 bluejays 1st rounder
3mil board cash
Tigers agree I need to keep up the rebuild and I get a lot more value by moving down
|
|
|
|
Post by Youth Movement on Jun 20, 2013 22:35:08 GMT -5
smh tigers with bad negotiating skills like usual
|
|
|
|
Post by Erbes on Jun 20, 2013 22:35:51 GMT -5
Probably should wait on this. In my opinion SD is safe from dropping. He should have been grandfathered in under the old rules which were 5 seasons of 100+ losses and that's it.
|
|
|
|
Post by If your not first your last on Jun 20, 2013 22:36:32 GMT -5
smh tigers with bad negotiating skills like usual Sorry I'm not going to take the guy to the cleaners just because we want the same player I think this was a fair deal so he gets who he wants |
|
|
|
Post by Free Stutter! on Jun 20, 2013 22:37:01 GMT -5
smh tigers with bad negotiating skills like usual jah didnt want him raping colorado |
|
|
|
Post by Captain America on Jun 20, 2013 22:38:49 GMT -5
Confirmed. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain America on Jun 20, 2013 22:39:27 GMT -5
Probably should wait on this. In my opinion SD is safe from dropping. He should have been grandfathered in under the old rules which were 5 seasons of 100+ losses and that's it. Looks like it's too late now. |
|
|
|
Post by If your not first your last on Jun 20, 2013 22:39:30 GMT -5
Probably should wait on this. In my opinion SD is safe from dropping. He should have been grandfathered in under the old rules which were 5 seasons of 100+ losses and that's it. So what is the point of having rules if we are just going to bend them, I remember getting screwed in a trade frenzy and not getting my talent increase because you said mr pitchers wouldn't count even thought mike Myers was a beast for boston |
|
|
|
Post by Erbes on Jun 20, 2013 22:41:22 GMT -5
Probably should wait on this. In my opinion SD is safe from dropping. He should have been grandfathered in under the old rules which were 5 seasons of 100+ losses and that's it. Looks like it's too late now. Um it's not. |
|
|
|
Post by Erbes on Jun 20, 2013 22:41:49 GMT -5
Probably should wait on this. In my opinion SD is safe from dropping. He should have been grandfathered in under the old rules which were 5 seasons of 100+ losses and that's it. So what is the point of having rules if we are just going to bend them, I remember getting screwed in a trade frenzy and not getting my talent increase because you said mr pitchers wouldn't count even thought mike Myers was a beast for boston It's not bending. It says right in the rule that teams will get grandfathered in. |
|
|
|
Post by If your not first your last on Jun 20, 2013 22:42:29 GMT -5
So what is the point of having rules if we are just going to bend them, I remember getting screwed in a trade frenzy and not getting my talent increase because you said mr pitchers wouldn't count even thought mike Myers was a beast for boston It's not bending. It says right in the rule that teams will get grandfathered in. Lol awesome |
|
|
|
Post by Captain America on Jun 20, 2013 22:42:58 GMT -5
If the Padres end up getting the 1st pick, then this trade should get voided. I'd only do this for the #1 pick and not for #2.
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain America on Jun 20, 2013 22:43:51 GMT -5
Looks like the committee might need to get together.
|
|
|
|
Post by Erbes on Jun 20, 2013 22:45:02 GMT -5
Looks like the committee might need to get together. Why? This will obviously not go through. |
|
|
|
Post by Captain America on Jun 20, 2013 22:45:49 GMT -5
Looks like the committee might need to get together. Why? This will obviously not go through. No not for this trade, but for whether Habes should actually get the first pick or not. |
|
|
|
Post by If your not first your last on Jun 20, 2013 22:47:54 GMT -5
Any other rules we can change and just let people get a pass
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain America on Jun 20, 2013 22:48:10 GMT -5
And why wouldn't this trade go through if the current rules stay as is?
|
|
|
|
Post by Saitama on Jun 20, 2013 22:52:44 GMT -5
smh at the pick obviously getting dropped if it was Shale and not Habes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Youth Movement on Jun 20, 2013 22:54:33 GMT -5
Why? This will obviously not go through. No not for this trade, but for whether Habes should actually get the first pick or not. lmaooo. committee doesn't need to be involved, it's not a trade. |
|
|
|
Post by Youth Movement on Jun 20, 2013 22:54:59 GMT -5
karma for getting away for the ovedrafting imo. fucking karma.
|
|
|
|
Post by Free Stutter! on Jun 20, 2013 22:58:08 GMT -5
smh at the pick obviously getting dropped if it was Shale and not Habes. wtf are you talking about it clearly says GODFATHERED IN. IT FUCKING SAYS THAT IN THE RULES AND DIDNT YOU CLEARLY STATE THAT IF ITS IN THE RULES...ITS GOOD IN YOUR BOOK? |
|
Broph
General Manager 
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Jun 20, 2013 22:58:54 GMT -5
Godfathered lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Youth Movement on Jun 20, 2013 22:58:57 GMT -5
that's when it favored snb man
|
|
Broph
General Manager
Oakland Athletics
Im no longer a shitty GM
Posts: 29,215
|
Post by Broph on Jun 20, 2013 22:59:38 GMT -5
It's not bending. It says right in the rule that teams will get grandfathered in. Lol awesome you landed number 2, not number one, if you were in anyway fair you woulda not cared,BS to try to cheat a gm out of the first overall |
|
|
|
Post by Saitama on Jun 20, 2013 23:00:17 GMT -5
Grandfathered in doesn't undo the fact that he lost 120 in one season. It's in the rules. It doesn't matter what else he did previously the rules came into play this year and he broke the 1 year rule. It's logic...
|
|
